<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marc&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marc.storck.lu/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog</link>
	<description>Things from me about me ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<cloud domain='marc.storck.lu' port='80' path='/blog/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>I’m Being Attacked by PRISONER.IANA.ORG! aka RFC 6305</title>
		<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/12/im-being-attacked-by-prisoner-iana-org-aka-rfc-6305/</link>
		<comments>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/12/im-being-attacked-by-prisoner-iana-org-aka-rfc-6305/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 21:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet & Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anycast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc.storck.lu/blog/?p=689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2009 I wrote about draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help-02. In 2011 the IETF released this document as RFC 6305.
As an operator of currently one AS112 ANYCAST Node and several NTP POOL servers I know how true and necessary this RFC really is.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2009 I <a title="I’m Being Attacked by PRISONER.IANA.ORG!" href="http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2009/05/im-being-attacked-by-prisonerianaorg/">wrote</a> about <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help-02" target="_blank">draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help-02</a>. In 2011 the IETF released this document as <a title="RFC 6305" href="http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6305.txt" target="_blank">RFC 6305</a>.</p>
<p>As an operator of currently one AS112 ANYCAST Node and several NTP POOL servers I know how true and necessary this RFC really is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/12/im-being-attacked-by-prisoner-iana-org-aka-rfc-6305/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No public IP for EPT LuxFibre</title>
		<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/09/no-public-ip-for-ept-luxfibre/</link>
		<comments>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/09/no-public-ip-for-ept-luxfibre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet & Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc.storck.lu/blog/?p=644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EPT has officially launched the LuxFibre service beginning of September, although there are rumors that some friendly test customers had LuxFibre installation in service prior to September 2011.
Some LuxFibre users already reported that the standard LuxFibre service (no optional serviced booked) does not provide a public IP address on WAN interface. EPT assigns a private [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EPT has officially launched the LuxFibre service beginning of September, although there are rumors that some friendly test customers had LuxFibre installation in service prior to September 2011.<br />
Some LuxFibre users already reported that the standard LuxFibre service (no optional serviced booked) does not provide a public IP address on WAN interface. EPT assigns a private IP address by default, so the user&#8217;s Internet access will be subject to NAT44 (aka double IPv4 NAT). NAT44 breaks all kind of services mostly those which already have difficulties with single/simple NAT. EPT optionally assigns a dynamic and public IP address to the WAN interface of your router. This will allow Internet access with single/simple NAT, however at the cost of 1,99 EUR / month (<a href="http://www.pt.lu/portal/lang/en/telecom/pid/4061" target="_blank">http://www.pt.lu/portal/lang/en/telecom/pid/4061</a>).<br />
Some may say it&#8217;s time for IPv6, a service available from EPT free of charge as an OPT-IN service (<a href="http://www.pt.lu/portal/lang/en/telecom/pid/3998" target="_blank">http://www.pt.lu/portal/lang/en/telecom/pid/3998</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/09/no-public-ip-for-ept-luxfibre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here comes the FTTH</title>
		<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/08/here-comes-the-ftth/</link>
		<comments>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/08/here-comes-the-ftth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet & Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc.storck.lu/blog/?p=632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and the VDSL  
Luxembourg&#8217;s Regulator just released its latest decision to approve the P&#38;T Luxembourg (EPT) Reference Offer for Very High Bandwith Access Lines based on VDSL and FTTH (fibre to the home).
Visual online already published their own prices for their LuxFibre clone called VOFiber. Prices are 0,09 to 5,00 EUR / month cheaper, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the VDSL <img src='http://marc.storck.lu/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Luxembourg&#8217;s Regulator just released its <a href="http://www.ilr.public.lu/communications_electroniques/decisions/2011/E11156ILR.pdf" target="_blank">latest decision</a> to approve the P&amp;T Luxembourg (EPT) Reference Offer for Very High Bandwith Access Lines based on VDSL and FTTH (fibre to the home).</p>
<p><span id="more-632"></span>Visual online already published their own prices for their LuxFibre clone called VOFiber. Prices are 0,09 to 5,00 EUR / month cheaper, the basic offers include an Internet flate rate and the possibility for 3 concurrent calls without any additional fees.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m curious to see prices from Luxembourg Online, ORANGE, TANGO etc!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/08/here-comes-the-ftth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>P&amp;T Luxembourg re-announces prices for LuxFibre</title>
		<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/pt-luxembourg-re-announces-prices-for-luxfibre/</link>
		<comments>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/pt-luxembourg-re-announces-prices-for-luxfibre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet & Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADSL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTTH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc.storck.lu/blog/?p=626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[P&#38;T Luxembourg has released a new price list valid from September 1, 2011.
Prices for FTTH based LuxFibre prices are as follows:

Down   30 Mb/s &#8211; Up 10 Mb/s: 54,99 EUR incl VAT / month
Down   50 Mb/s &#8211; Up 25 Mb/s: 59,99 EUR incl VAT / month
Down 100 Mb/s &#8211; Up 50Mb/s: 74,99 EUR incl VAT [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P&amp;T Luxembourg has released a new <a title="P&amp;T Luxembourg Price List valid from 2011-09-01" href="http://www.pt.lu/webdav/site/portailEPT/groups/DT_redacteurs/public/downloads/Liste%20de%20prix%20des%20services%20de%20t%C3%A9l%C3%A9communications%20n.%2022_29-07-2011.pdf" target="_blank">price list</a> valid from September 1, 2011.</p>
<p>Prices for FTTH based LuxFibre prices are as follows:<span id="more-626"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Down   30 Mb/s &#8211; Up 10 Mb/s: 54,99 EUR incl VAT / month</li>
<li>Down   50 Mb/s &#8211; Up 25 Mb/s: 59,99 EUR incl VAT / month</li>
<li>Down 100 Mb/s &#8211; Up 50Mb/s: 74,99 EUR incl VAT / month</li>
</ul>
<p>These prices do not contain a volume flat-rate, this is available for 9,99 EUR / month or within the Integral package.</p>
<p>The telephone service comes with the capacity for 1 concurrent call, an upgrade to 3 concurrent calls is available at 6,00 EUR / month. Unfortunately the 3 concurrent calls limit is the absolute maximum, on a fibre access delivering up to 100 Mb/s, limiting telephony to 384 Kb/s seems somewhat arbitrary!</p>
<p>Beside that, the pricing is high compared to our european neighbors:</p>
<ul>
<li>in France Orange charges 33,99 EUR / month for 100 Mb/s flat, telephony flat and IPTV</li>
<li>in Germany Telekom charges 39,95 EUR / month for up to 50 Mb/s flat and telephony flat</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/pt-luxembourg-re-announces-prices-for-luxfibre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPv6 route table limits under Linux</title>
		<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/ipv6-route-table-limits-under-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/ipv6-route-table-limits-under-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hobbies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc.storck.lu/blog/?p=622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been experimenting with IPv6 addressing and routing under different Linux flavors. Addressing in LANs is quite easy with Auto/Zero-Conf, however for Auto/Zero-Conf you need to use /64 network, which could lead to memory exhaustion due to a Neighbor Discovery attack (I will write more on this later, so check below for related articles). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been experimenting with IPv6 addressing and routing under different Linux flavors. Addressing in LANs is quite easy with Auto/Zero-Conf, however for Auto/Zero-Conf you need to use /64 network, which could lead to memory exhaustion due to a Neighbor Discovery attack (I will write more on this later, so check below for related articles). Routing is equally simple to setup with Router Advertisements.</p>
<p>So I wanted to go a step further and loaded a full IPv6 routing table via BGP into a linux box. Mine unfortunately had a limit in the kernel, actually net.ipv6.route.max_size was set to 4096. The BGP feed I used delivered 6419 prefixes and only 4068 were loaded into the kernel table.<span id="more-622"></span></p>
<p>I added the following line to sysctl.conf</p>
<blockquote><p>net.ipv6.route.max_size = 32768</p></blockquote>
<p>and then cleared the BGP session, the kernel routing table now contained 6401 lines. So in case you are running into IPv6 routing issues on your linux box, check for this limit. Also keep an eye on the BGP IPv6 table size, in the future the table might outgrow the limit you have set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/ipv6-route-table-limits-under-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is Luxembourg (2)</title>
		<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/this-is-luxembourg-2/</link>
		<comments>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/this-is-luxembourg-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 19:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc.storck.lu/blog/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another video presenting the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another video presenting the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/NXl2lhVN2co?rel=0" frameborder="0" width="560" height="349"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/this-is-luxembourg-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ILR opens range 28 for allocation</title>
		<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/ilr-opens-range-28-for-allocation/</link>
		<comments>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/ilr-opens-range-28-for-allocation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Numbering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc.storck.lu/blog/?p=615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luxembourg&#8217;s regulator has opened the numbering range 28 for allocation to operators on July 1, 2011. The range was long time blocked for historical reasons.
Prior to May 1, 2006 the mobile network operator LUXGSM used the numbering range 028 for its mobile voicemail service. Due to the common practice to omit the leading 0 when dialing a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luxembourg&#8217;s <a title="Institut Luxembourgeois de Régulation" href="http://www.ilr.lu" target="_blank">regulator</a> has <a href="http://www.ilr.public.lu/communications_electroniques/decisions/2011/E11155ILR.pdf" target="_blank">opened</a> the numbering range 28 for allocation to operators on July 1, 2011. The range was long time blocked for historical reasons.</p>
<p>Prior to May 1, 2006 the mobile network operator LUXGSM used the numbering range 028 for its mobile voicemail service. Due to the common practice to omit the leading 0 when dialing a number from abroad, the numbering range 28 was aliased to 028 when called from abroad. This obviously rendered the numbering range 28 unusable for other services.<span id="more-615"></span></p>
<p>On November 1, 2006 all the numbers starting with 028 were finally disabled and so was the alias. Now came probably the more difficult part, most foreign operator charged calls to the numbering range 28 as mobile calls, but the range was now available for future usage as geographic fixed network numbers. Over 4,5 years later most network operators to be taken seriously should have updated their billing systems.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t seen any numbers starting with 28 in the wild, but EPT and VO already hold allocations from the 28 superblock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/07/ilr-opens-range-28-for-allocation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AVM just released a new Lab firmware version</title>
		<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/06/avm-just-released-a-new-lab-firmware-version/</link>
		<comments>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/06/avm-just-released-a-new-lab-firmware-version/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet & Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AVM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fritz Box]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc.storck.lu/blog/?p=612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AVM has released a new Lab firmware version for the Fritz!Box 7390 and 7340. The AVM developers seem to have worked really hard, a lot of work was done on the DECT, IPv6 and NAS part. The Lab firmware now supports secure DECT repeating mode, the AVM DECT phones will be able to display pictures [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AVM has released a new Lab firmware version for the Fritz!Box 7390 and 7340. The AVM developers seem to have worked really hard, a lot of work was done on the DECT, IPv6 and NAS part. The Lab firmware now supports secure DECT repeating mode, the AVM DECT phones will be able to display pictures included in RSS feeds and use custom PM3 ringtones. On the IPv6 stack RFC5969 aka 6rd was added, DS Lite is now supported.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>You can find more details on the <a href="http://www.avm.de/en/service/Lab/index.php" target="_blank">AVM Lab Portal</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/06/avm-just-released-a-new-lab-firmware-version/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook accounts unavailable</title>
		<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/04/facebook-accounts-unavailable/</link>
		<comments>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/04/facebook-accounts-unavailable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet & Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc.storck.lu/blog/?p=604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For several hours already Facebook shows an error message instead of the regular site to some users.
The issue seems to affect a restricted number of accounts, so just sit back and relax   Eventually your account will be back soon.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For several hours already Facebook shows an error message instead of the regular site to some users.</p>
<div id="attachment_605" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://marc.storck.lu/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/FireShot-capture-031-Account-Temporarily-Unavailable-I-Facebook-www_facebook_com_sorry_php_msgaccount.png"><img class="size-medium wp-image-605" title="Account Temporarily Unavailable" src="http://marc.storck.lu/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/FireShot-capture-031-Account-Temporarily-Unavailable-I-Facebook-www_facebook_com_sorry_php_msgaccount-300x70.png" alt="Account Temporarily Unavailable" width="300" height="70" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Account Temporarily Unavailable</p></div>
<p>The issue seems to affect a restricted number of accounts, so just sit back and relax <img src='http://marc.storck.lu/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' />  Eventually your account will be back soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/04/facebook-accounts-unavailable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is Luxembourg (an alternative)</title>
		<link>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/01/this-is-luxembourg-an-alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/01/this-is-luxembourg-an-alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marc.storck.lu/blog/?p=598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><object width="425" height="350" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Fd1C78W4igs" /><embed width="425" height="350" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Fd1C78W4igs" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://marc.storck.lu/blog/2011/01/this-is-luxembourg-an-alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

